Meaning is not in yourself
Reading | Existentialism
Prof. Orlando Moreira, PhD | 2025-06-13
In this very personal, poignant essay, Moreira argues that our most primal fear isn’t death, but solitude. As he says, “A child does not cry because she understands mortality. She cries because no one comes.” Moreira is redefining Existentialism for the 21st century. He mines and distills the core questions of meaning in a world that is beginning to intuit the shallowness of its ways.
A year ago, I was diagnosed with a brain tumor.
It wasn’t fatal.
I had already been struggling with increasing hearing loss in one ear. One of the doctors told me I was imagining it. He even told me I was crazy for thinking that. But the tinnitus was worsening—shrill, reactive to sound, inescapable. I was convinced that once I saw a specialist, she would figure out something, and things would improve. In our first meeting, she promised me it would get better. One month later, she told me the opposite. It wouldn’t improve. It would get worse. I would eventually go deaf in one ear. The tinnitus would get louder.
And it did. Two months later, the noise became unbearable; and reactive to other sounds. Before the GP agreed to prescribe sleeping pills and antidepressants, I went six days without sleep. I was panicking, in absolute despair, a wreck.
Music—always a core of my inner life—became distorted, then unlistenable. What had once grounded me now wounded me. I had imagined my later years spent visiting the world’s concert halls and opera houses. That future is gone. The distortion is permanent. The silence is overrun by noise. The world didn’t end, but it lost its sweetness.
As my hearing collapsed, I began to fear more than just noise and silence. With age, my vision has also started to weaken. The arts that once gave me solace—music, literature, cinema, painting—began to feel fragile, contingent. I saw the possibility of a future where no form of beauty, no intellectual pursuit, would remain accessible to me. But the real dread wasn’t sensorial or aesthetic. It wasn’t about losing pleasure. It was the creeping horror that even shared experience might one day, not too far, become unreachable and life would go on without it. And although this was part of my thoughts at the time, I only half realized how essential it was.
For a while, I wanted to die. When the medication began to take effect, that urge faded; but I no longer wanted to be alive either.
It wasn’t despair. Not depression. Just a hollowing out. I felt like a broken doll. Music, but also other arts, movement, contemplation, and even quiet conversation, lost their appeal completely. Sound itself was hostile. I stayed inside. I stopped exercising. My health declined.
Psychologists told me that doing things would help; that motion could hold despair at bay. So I kept going. I functioned. I spoke. I worked. But it felt hopeless. Life was to force yourself to go through another day. Don’t think too much. The resonance was gone.
And still, I went on, because what else can you do?
They told me to look within for meaning, intent, pleasure. To find my true self. But I found nothing worth keeping. No purpose in work. No comfort in thought. Yes, there were pleasurable activities: reading, studying, intellectual work; but there was no real reason to endure.
Yet, there was something else too: an urge to tell others how I felt. And whenever I did, when I spoke with raw honesty, others would eventually tell me their own stories; their suffering, their pain, their grief, their worries. It made me think of how much we suffer and how much pain we hide. And it was in listening to them that I found motivation and meaning.
That was it. The others. My children. My wife. My brother. Friends. Colleagues. People who, each in their own way, told me they would rather live in a world with me than one without me.
That didn’t restore music or peace, but it gave me a place to go. Not certainty. Not confirmation. Just a reason to stay, and a reason to build.
Ernest Becker believed humans construct meaning to deny death; that we fear extinction, and so we build culture, ego, myth. I find his message compelling. His work, along with Camus and Schopenhauer, has strongly shaped how I see the world. But I think he missed something deeper.
The primary fear isn’t death: it’s being alone—eternally, structurally, metaphysically alone. Death is finite; solitude without escape is not. Even an immortal life in perfect conditions, if lived in isolation, is not freedom; it’s collapse without end.
I wouldn’t choose it. Not even for silence. Not even for the return of music. I would rather live in this broken world, in my weakened body, among flawed and finite others, than in a perfect world inhabited only by myself. I’d rather be one of many than a lone god.
There’s a moment in For the Man Who Has Everything—a Superman story by Allan Moore, which I read many years ago for the first time and to which I always eventually return—in which Superman is trapped in an illusion where Krypton never exploded. In that illusion, he has a family, a son he loves. And as the illusion begins to crack, he holds the boy and says: “I was there at your birth, and I will always love you but… but I don’t think that you’re real.” And he lets go.
He doesn’t leave because his fantasy world is unpleasant; quite the contrary He leaves because it is not inhabited. It’s full of all the things he ever wanted—a simple life, a family, memory, love—but no Other; no inner life; no suffering; no real presence. It is perfect in every way except for the absence of other minds.
And that makes it unbearable.
That moment stayed with me. The dream was vivid. The love was real. But it wasn’t mutual. And when it becomes clear that no one else is truly there, I will always choose the world that might still contain others, even if it hurts.
And if I choose this world because I can’t bear to be existentially alone, then I must hope others feel the same. I reach because I need them, but if they exist, they might need me too. And that’s enough to make it a responsibility.
Becker understood our instinct towards death. But not the first fear. A child does not cry because she understands mortality. She cries because no one comes.
That is what kept me alive. Not belief. Not clarity. Just the chance that I might still matter; that someone might need me; that someone would feel my absence.
This is not noble. It is not defiance. It is not bad faith. It is simply the truest act of hope I could take in a life stripped of all guarantees.
Camus asked: Why not kill yourself?
I answer: Because someone may be there.
And that must be enough.
L’espoir, c’est les autres.
Essentia Foundation communicates, in an accessible but rigorous manner, the latest results in science and philosophy that point to the mental nature of reality. We are committed to strict, academic-level curation of the material we publish.
Recently published
|
Stephen Lester invites us to contemplate the relationship between the seemingly individual self and the world—including other seemingly individual selves—merely as different perspectives within a continuous ecosystem. Ecology has taught us to see the world as an interconnected whole. In much the same way, embodied awareness can teach us that we aren’t separate from the world, but instead that the objects we observe are merely other perspectives within the same consciousness we are.
|
Dr. Koch argues that, because AI computers have a feed-forward structure very reminiscent of the human cerebellum—which is empirically known not to be involved in human consciousness—we have no reason to expect AI computers to have a conscious inner life of their own. He further substantiates his argument with the clear, quantified prediction of Integrated Information Theory (IIT) that systems with low integrated information, such as silicon computers implementing Large Language Models, do not feel like anything from the inside.
From the archives
|
Prof. Larry Nazareth recounts the fundamental difference in perspective that underlies the Cartesian and Bergsonian views of life and world. The former’s dictum states: ‘I compute, algorithmically, therefore I think, symbolically, therefore I am, experientially.’ The latter, however, reverses this dictum: ‘I am, experientially, therefore I think, symbolically, therefore I compute, algorithmically.’ Depending on which of these views we choose to base our understanding of nature and life, we may or may not have a future, Nazareth argues.
|
How is it possible that the cerebellum, which contains roughly 80% of all the neurons in the human brain, can be severely damaged, or even absent, without abolishing consciousness? In this conversation, Jeremiah Hendren, a member of the Integrated Information Theory (IIT) Lab and long-term collaborator of IIT founder Giulio Tononi, joins Hans Busstra to unpack Integrated Information Theory (IIT), a theory that answers this fascinating neuroscience mystery.
|
Dr. Currie argues that framing the effectiveness of shamanic medicine in terms of placebo effects alone does not do justice to the sophistication of shamanic practice. The latter, she maintains, is based on a complex, multi-tiered metaphysics whereby cause and effect relations beyond the visible material world are deliberately exploited by the shaman.
Reading
Essays
|
The search for authenticity fails because we conduct it in the wrong place: thought itself. The epistemic gap—the inability of concepts to capture experiential reality—produces the persistent sense that something fundamental about existence is amiss, a tension that underlies much existential questioning. When representations are mistaken for reality, three pervasive forms of suffering follow: fear of death, violence, and pride. Each dissolves when the error is recognized. But recognition alone fades; only sustained disengagement from conceptual identification makes the insight a lived experience, argues Steven Pashko.
|
Anil Seth is a world-leading neuroscientist who has made important contributions to our understanding of reality as a controlled hallucination. According to the concept of active inference, our perception of reality is not a direct reflection of the world but, instead, the most accurate guess that our brain can muster, which it continually checks and updates with incoming sensory information. But strange things happen when neuroscientists play around with sensory input in unexpected ways. Anil Seth and his team at Sussex University created the Dream Machine, a stroboscopic device that syncs flickering light to music to induce vivid, often complex, hallucinatory visuals in the viewer. In group sessions, exactly the same white light and music gives rise to a tremendous diversity in perception.
|
Prof. Larry Nazareth recounts the fundamental difference in perspective that underlies the Cartesian and Bergsonian views of life and world. The former’s dictum states: ‘I compute, algorithmically, therefore I think, symbolically, therefore I am, experientially.’ The latter, however, reverses this dictum: ‘I am, experientially, therefore I think, symbolically, therefore I compute, algorithmically.’ Depending on which of these views we choose to base our understanding of nature and life, we may or may not have a future, Nazareth argues.
|
How is it possible that the cerebellum, which contains roughly 80% of all the neurons in the human brain, can be severely damaged, or even absent, without abolishing consciousness? In this conversation, Jeremiah Hendren, a member of the Integrated Information Theory (IIT) Lab and long-term collaborator of IIT founder Giulio Tononi, joins Hans Busstra to unpack Integrated Information Theory (IIT), a theory that answers this fascinating neuroscience mystery.
|
Dr. Currie argues that framing the effectiveness of shamanic medicine in terms of placebo effects alone does not do justice to the sophistication of shamanic practice. The latter, she maintains, is based on a complex, multi-tiered metaphysics whereby cause and effect relations beyond the visible material world are deliberately exploited by the shaman.
Seeing
Videos
|
In this rigorous and absolutely clear essay, which might as well have been published in an academic journal, Haswell shows that Eliminativism—the notion that the qualities of experience don’t really exist—contradicts not only the most obvious pre-theoretical facts of nature, it also contradicts itself in a manner that cannot be remedied.
|
In this conversation with Hans Busstra, the legendary CPU inventor explains his quantum theory of consciousness in more detail and outlines some of his novel ideas, to be presented in his upcoming new book. He discusses, for instance, how we should regard our material universe: “spacetime and matter are the permanent memory of the experience of the self knowing of One.”
|
In this remarkably observant essay, Brian Fang shows that the mathematics of the ubiquitous Fourier transform—which ties the words of events and frequencies together—provides a formal grammar for understanding how temporality is a facet of eternity, and vice-versa. As such, perhaps what we call “the world” is not fundamentally made of matter unfolding in time, but of patterns that admit atemporal readings. This does not prove idealism, but makes it less strange. If being can be fully captured in structural terms, then perhaps the ultimate constituents of reality are not particles in motion, but intelligible patterns that merely appear temporal when viewed from within.
Let us build the future of our culture together
Essentia Foundation is a registered non-profit committed to making its content as accessible as possible. Therefore, we depend on non-financial contributions from people like you to continue to do our work.
