Gratis verzending vanaf €35,-
Unieke producten
Milieuvriendelijk, hoogste kwaliteit
Professioneel advies: 085 - 743 03 12

The limits of conceptual communication

Reading | Philosophy

Fred Matser | 2021-01-11

shutterstock 199733708

Fred Matser, Essentia Foundation’s Founder and Chairman, invites us to contemplate the limits of mere words and concepts in our interactions with one another and nature at large. Are we missing out on important things because we assume that what cannot be said also cannot exist?

We, human beings, are so used to using concepts and associated words to communicate with each other, we think they are the only form of communication possible; we forget not only all other communication mechanisms nature makes available to us, but also the intrinsic limitations of words. Although conceptual communication has undoubtedly been fundamental to the development of our culture and society, it is critically important that we remind ourselves—and then remain aware—of the trade-offs and sacrifices it entails.

Non-human beings communicate with each other and their environment all the time, without words or concepts. Plants communicate through the release of signaling chemicals, cephalopods through light and color displays, and even we, human beings, use non-verbal communication all the time: our acts, gestures, facial expressions, general countenance, the way we dress and even our scent. The whole of nature is indulging in unfathomable levels of subtle communication, our words being just a tiny subset of it.

This, of course, raises important questions: by focusing on words alone, aren’t we missing out on much of what is going on? Are we overlooking important signs and indications by assuming that whatever cannot be captured in words doesn’t actually happen? That those who cannot speak have nothing to communicate? Are we forfeiting a broader, deeper, more functional relationship with the abundant nature that surrounds us because we ignore its other ways of communication? Could the great dangers facing our society today—think of climate change and fast-shrinking biodiversity, both of which can have catastrophic consequences for humanity—be more easily perceived, taken seriously and finally resolved if we, natural beings that we are, would only open ourselves up to the non-verbal channels of communication that surround us at all times?

Concepts and words are tools and thus—as any tool—have inherent limitations; they aren’t applicable to everything, just as a hammer isn’t applicable to tightening a screw. There is much that can’t be captured in concepts; yet it exists and is important, even critically important. Poets have gone to great lengths to capture the subtleties of human inner life in words, which shows that—even when it comes to humans themselves—much skill is required to corral what is important into a web of concepts. Imagine, then, how much we miss out on when it comes to the non-human aspects of nature! How much may be going on right now, that we have no clue of because we are not listening!

Essentia Foundation communicates largely through words and numbers—that is, concepts. Therefore, Essentia, too, is fundamentally limited in how far it can go when attempting to touch on the important things of life and reality. But we are keenly aware of this limitation; we know the trade-offs we are incurring—or at least we think we do. This awareness is key to keeping us humble; it’s key to keeping our eyes on the ball, for we know that what is truly and ultimately important can only be pointed to, not captured. And so we shall point to it with words, try to help you look in the right direction. But at the end of the day, only you, through direct acquaintance, can sense what theory and models can only hint at.

The writing of a message or a theory—any message, any theory—ultimately represents the culmination of an entire lifetime of experiences, insights, memories, dispositions and circumstances, which then express themselves partly in the words written. It is naïve to imagine that such words can encompass all the experiences and circumstances that have had a bearing on the writing of the message. No, words are just indications, signs on a road.

Anyone who thinks their words can convince others has failed to realize this, for the reading of a message is also the culmination of a lifetime of experiences, insights, memories, dispositions and circumstances, all of which are projected onto the message read. We don’t receive or interpret messages in an objective vacuum but, instead, in a rich subjective context unique to the reader, and to which the original writer has little access. Words cannot convince.

But they can invite the reader to look, along with the writer, in a certain direction. We can’t fully describe in mere words the highly nuanced and personal experience of watching the sun set; but we can invite another to look—along with us—to the West, so we can both share in the direct acquaintance with the truth of a sunset. By being directly acquainted with the truth pointed to, one needs no more convincing; one knows.

And so it is in this spirit that Essentia Foundation will do its work: we will invite you to look, along with us, in certain directions that have so far been neglected and even pooh-poohed by our mainstream culture; and to do so in a particular way, by squinting your eyes and focusing just right, so you see past the blurring barrier of inherited and unexamined assumptions, values and beliefs. If you then see what we see, we will share in an experience we consider vital for the survival of our civilization. And you will know.

So please consider yourself invited. Let us look together in the direction of a promising horizon; not to a sunset, but a new sunrise.

Subhash MIND BEFORE MATTER scaled

Essentia Foundation communicates, in an accessible but rigorous manner, the latest results in science and philosophy that point to the mental nature of reality. We are committed to strict, academic-level curation of the material we publish.

Recently published

|

Can brain anatomy and function account for psychiatric conditions?

In this in-depth interview, Prof. dr. Sarah Durston discusses the limitations of trying to account for psychiatric conditions based solely on measurable brain anatomy and function. Her candid answers may surprise those who think that brain-reductionism rests on solid ground for at least the most common psychiatric conditions.

|

Metaphysics underpins all of our thinking (The Return of Metaphysics)

To criticize metaphysics is itself inevitably to rely on certain metaphysical claims, thereby making metaphysics impervious. Metaphysical ideas underpin all our thinking, argues Prof. Robert Stern.

From the archives

|

Playing in the field: The nature of children and consciousness

Through their play and the extraordinary inner experiences they report, children reveal a broader, non-local, decentered and shared self. Because children are less conditioned than adults, this may be a clue to the true nature and scope of self and reality, as well as the role of consciousness within it, argues Dr. Donna Thomas.

|

The timeless mind: A thought experiment

Mind cannot be reduced to matter. Therefore, instead of looking for the origin of mind, we must understand reality in semiotic terms: as a universal set of signifiers and meanings. This is the argument put forward by Massimilano Sorrentino and Daniela Panighetti in this essay.

|

A psychiatrist’s perspective on dissociation and complexity

Today’s article is a master class on dissociation, from the field of psychiatry. It breaks down the complexity of this phenomenon, and shows us that it is a much more common process in life than is generally thought. Furthermore, when observed in the realm of mind and then extrapolated beyond to consciousness as a whole, it allows for a better understanding of the fundamental premise at the heart of analytic idealism.

Reading

Essays

|

Metaphysics is inescapable: Even Wittgenstein was a metaphysician (The Return of Metaphysics)

In distancing himself from the Big Questions, such as the nature of reality and the meaning of life, Ludwig Wittgenstein ends up applying a generally-defined form of metaphysics as an antidote to unclear thinking.

|

Situating Analytic Idealism within Nietzsche’s critique of realism: A world-historical view

Modern analytic idealism may offer a path to resolving the historical tension between realism (the notion that we can know something about the world out there, as it is in itself) and a Nietzschean relativism that confines all knowledge to merely personal subjectivity, writes Prof. Grego. 

|

Playing in the field: The nature of children and consciousness

Through their play and the extraordinary inner experiences they report, children reveal a broader, non-local, decentered and shared self. Because children are less conditioned than adults, this may be a clue to the true nature and scope of self and reality, as well as the role of consciousness within it, argues Dr. Donna Thomas.

|

The timeless mind: A thought experiment

Mind cannot be reduced to matter. Therefore, instead of looking for the origin of mind, we must understand reality in semiotic terms: as a universal set of signifiers and meanings. This is the argument put forward by Massimilano Sorrentino and Daniela Panighetti in this essay.

|

A psychiatrist’s perspective on dissociation and complexity

Today’s article is a master class on dissociation, from the field of psychiatry. It breaks down the complexity of this phenomenon, and shows us that it is a much more common process in life than is generally thought. Furthermore, when observed in the realm of mind and then extrapolated beyond to consciousness as a whole, it allows for a better understanding of the fundamental premise at the heart of analytic idealism.

Seeing

Videos

|

How to understand your mind, beyond thought

The unmediated experience of where the question “what am I?” arises in our mind is already its answer, writes Johannes Jörg; an answer that cannot be produced by thought alone. To understand our own minds, we must go beyond conceptual reasoning and explore our older, more primary mental faculties. By merely being aware of our often-ignored inner states, we can restore balance to our lives. This is because living systems are self-organizing: when dysregulation comes into awareness, it is already being regulated.

|

How Idealism—and Schopenhauer—saved Tolstoy’s life

In the grip of the nihilistic ethos of late 19th-century materialism and Darwinism, Leo Tolstoy contemplated suicide. He would be saved only by finding confirmation, in Schopenhauer’s idealist philosophy, of his own earlier idealist intuitions. Idealism would go on to deeply transform Tolstoy’s life and work, reconnecting him to the simple but profound intuitions of meaning that pervade the lives of peasants. This easy-to-read essay recounts the existential difficulties of a world-famous individual who presaged both our cultural ethos today, and the transformative opportunities offered by modern idealism.

|

Can we live without searching for ultimate truths? (The Return of Metaphysics)

It is second nature for human beings to look for ultimate truths and ground our lives on that search. But should we give up on ultimates altogether and, instead, live pragmatically on the basis of the best ‘literary story’ we can come up with? Dr. Danielsen Huckerby describes how philosopher Richard Rorty argued for just that.

Let us build the future of our culture together

Essentia Foundation is a registered non-profit committed to making its content as accessible as possible and without advertisements. Therefore, we depend on contributions from people like you to continue to do our work. There are many ways to contribute.

Essentia Contribute scaled